Key findings
- 1
Screening can be read for 61 of the 62 platforms with open roles on 31 Oct 2026: full descriptions of 4,000 roles on 61 platforms (91.3% of open roles) and application forms of 1,682 roles on 34 (38.4%); Alignerr publishes neither.
- 2
14.1% of the 4,000 described roles state a selection step (a test, an interview or a check), most often an assessment, test or trial task (9.0%), then an interview with a person or of an unstated kind (5.6%); 0.8% state a background check or identity verification.
- 3
20.2% of described roles ask for proof of expertise: 16.6% name a professional credential or licence and 4.5% ask for work samples, a portfolio or a publication record.
- 4
Most described roles state none of the 7 screening steps counted (69.4%); 8.0% state two or more.
- 5
Of the 48 platforms with enough descriptions to compare, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective states the most screening (40.0% of its 10 roles read name two or more steps) and Welo Data, Anyone AI, Prolific, DataAnnotation, Rise Data Labs, Mindrift, Sigma AI, Perle Labs, TELUS Digital AI, Babel Audio, Outlier (Scale AI), Lifted (Upwork), TransPerfect DataForce, Appen, Claru, OpenTrain AI, Terac, Innodata, Vetto, OneForma, xAI (SpaceXAI), Aligned Labs, iMerit, Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip), DATAmundi, Pasiflora AI, Elsevier Health, Cohere, Pila8, RealTrainAI, Mistral AI, Remotasks and Sama the least (none name two or more).
- 6
Of the 12 kinds of work with enough described roles to read on their own, AI Evaluation & Rating (RLHF) roles state the most screening (13.6% name two or more steps) and Robotics Data and Writing roles the least (none name two or more).
- 7
Of the 1,682 application forms read, 85.7% require a resume, 86.6% a phone number and 41.3% a LinkedIn profile; 14.3% require an answer on work authorization, 7.4% on availability and 7.7% on pay.
- 8
A form has a median of 10 fields, 10 of them required; among the 21 platforms with enough forms read to state one, the median runs from 3 required fields at Terac to 24 at Volga Partners.
Figure 1
What this report can see, platform by platform
For which platforms can screening be read, and from which source?
| Platform | Open roles | Full descriptions read | Application forms read |
|---|---|---|---|
| All platforms | 4,381 | 91.3% | 38.4% |
| Invisible | 533 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| SuperAnnotate (SME) | 379 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Alignerr | 361 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| micro1 | 302 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Mercor | 237 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| AfterQuery | 230 | 99.6% | 0.0% |
| Handshake AI | 184 | 100.0% | 0.5% |
| Welo Data | 184 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Turing | 176 | 99.4% | 0.0% |
| RWS TrainAI Community | 143 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Anyone AI | 133 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Prolific | 124 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| DataAnnotation | 112 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Rise Data Labs | 108 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Weekday | 108 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Mindrift | 90 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Sigma AI | 81 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Braintrust | 77 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Perle Labs | 67 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| TELUS Digital AI | 67 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Claru | 60 | 70.0% | 0.0% |
| Volga Partners | 59 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Babel Audio | 47 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Outlier (Scale AI) | 46 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Lifted (Upwork) | 45 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| TransPerfect DataForce | 44 | 100.0% | 86.4% |
| Appen | 42 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| OpenTrain AI | 40 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Terac | 37 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Sovrano AI | 36 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| RemoExperts | 32 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Innodata | 31 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vetto | 20 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| OneForma | 17 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| xAI (SpaceXAI) | 17 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Aligned Labs | 15 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Surge AI | 13 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Scale AI Human Frontier Collective | 10 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| iMerit | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip) | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| DATAmundi | 8 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Pasiflora AI | 7 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Elsevier Health | 6 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Cohere | 4 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Pila8 | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| RealTrainAI | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Mistral AI | 3 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Remotasks | 3 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Sama | 3 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Fleet AI | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Anthropic | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Edison Scientific | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| EvolutionIQ | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Headway | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Inworld AI | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| JazzX AI | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Kastle | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Limbic | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| PointClickCare | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Snorkel AI Expert Community | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Trellis | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vals AI | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Sample. The 4,381 roles open on 31 Oct 2026 on the 62 platforms AITraining.jobs reads; full descriptions of 4,000 of them and application forms of 1,682.
Shares are of each platform's own open roles. A platform's board either publishes full descriptions or exposes its application form through an applicant-tracking system, and some do neither: each later figure ranks a platform only on the source it publishes.
Descriptions and forms are read on the same day as the open roles.
No row with any open roles is a small sample: the rows differ so much that each reads on its own from its first.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 2
Screening steps stated in role descriptions
How often do platforms say they will test, interview or verify an applicant, or ask for proof of expertise?
| Step | Roles stating it | Share of described roles |
|---|---|---|
| An assessment, test or trial task | 362 | 9.0% |
| An AI-led or recorded interview | 203 | 5.1% |
| An interview with a person, or of an unstated kind | 225 | 5.6% |
| A background check | 26 | 0.7% |
| Identity verification | 16 | 0.4% |
| A professional credential or licence named | 665 | 16.6% |
| Work samples, a portfolio or publications | 178 | 4.5% |
Sample. 4,000 roles open on 31 Oct 2026 whose job board publishes a full description (AfterQuery, Aligned Labs, Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Babel Audio, Braintrust, Claru, Cohere, DataAnnotation, DATAmundi, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Fleet AI, Handshake AI, Headway, iMerit, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Lifted (Upwork), Limbic, Mercor, micro1, Mindrift, Mistral AI, OneForma, OpenTrain AI, Outlier (Scale AI), Pasiflora AI, Perle Labs, Pila8, PointClickCare, Prolific, RealTrainAI, RemoExperts, Remotasks, Rise Data Labs, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip), Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Sovrano AI, SuperAnnotate (SME), Surge AI, TELUS Digital AI, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Turing, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI)): 91.3% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read.
A step counts when the description states it, as a requirement or as something that may be asked ('a brief assessment may be added'). A platform can screen more than it writes down, so every share is a floor.
The assessment, interview and check steps are read only in the passage about applying and selection (a selection section, or a sentence that speaks of applicants, candidates, onboarding or the hiring process), so 'conduct psychological assessments' or 'transcribe interviews' in the work itself is not counted. The requirements report counts any mention, so its shares are higher.
An AI-led or recorded interview has its own line; a role that also states a further interview ('an AI interview ... and an interview with a recruiter') counts on both. A credential or licence, and work samples, a portfolio or a publication record, are proof of expertise and are read from the whole description: named as a requirement or a preference.
Invisible lists 13.3% of the described roles, so the pooled shares lean on its process; the by-platform figure separates the platforms.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 3
Screening depth: steps stated per role
How many screening steps does a typical AI training role describe?
| Steps stated | Roles | Share of described roles |
|---|---|---|
| None stated | 2,777 | 69.4% |
| 1 step | 902 | 22.6% |
| 2 steps | 197 | 4.9% |
| 3 steps or more | 124 | 3.1% |
Sample. 4,000 roles open on 31 Oct 2026 whose job board publishes a full description (AfterQuery, Aligned Labs, Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Babel Audio, Braintrust, Claru, Cohere, DataAnnotation, DATAmundi, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Fleet AI, Handshake AI, Headway, iMerit, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Lifted (Upwork), Limbic, Mercor, micro1, Mindrift, Mistral AI, OneForma, OpenTrain AI, Outlier (Scale AI), Pasiflora AI, Perle Labs, Pila8, PointClickCare, Prolific, RealTrainAI, RemoExperts, Remotasks, Rise Data Labs, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip), Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Sovrano AI, SuperAnnotate (SME), Surge AI, TELUS Digital AI, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Turing, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI)): 91.3% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read; a median of 0 of the 7 steps stated.
Screening depth: how many of the 7 steps in the steps figure a description states.
A step counts when the description states it, as a requirement or as something that may be asked ('a brief assessment may be added'). A platform can screen more than it writes down, so every share is a floor.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 4
Screening stated, by platform
Which platforms describe the most screening, and which steps does each state?
| Platform | Assessment | AI interview | Interview | Background check | ID check | Median steps | 2 or more steps | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All described roles | 9% | 5% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 17% | 5% | 0.0 | 8% |
| Invisible | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 4% | 0.0 | 0% |
| SuperAnnotate (SME) | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 1% | 0.0 | 27% |
| micro1 | 2% | 19% | 3% | 0% | 1% | 22% | 7% | 0.0 | 8% |
| Mercor | 5% | 5% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 15% | 0.0 | 17% |
| AfterQuery | 33% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 5% | 28% | 11% | 1.0 | 30% |
| Handshake AI | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 20% | 0.0 | 9% |
| Welo Data | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Turing | 25% | 1% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 7% | 0.0 | 5% |
| RWS TrainAI Community | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 93% | 0% | 1.0 | 2% |
| Anyone AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Prolific | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 2% | 0.0 | 0% |
| DataAnnotation | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Rise Data Labs | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Weekday | 8% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 2% | 27% | 10% | 0.0 | 5% |
| Mindrift | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 44% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Sigma AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Braintrust | 35% | 16% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 1.0 | 21% |
| Perle Labs | 13% | 0% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 1.0 | 0% |
| TELUS Digital AI | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Volga Partners | 27% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 0% | 1.0 | 27% |
| Babel Audio | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Outlier (Scale AI) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Lifted (Upwork) | 29% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| TransPerfect DataForce | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Appen | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Claru | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| OpenTrain AI | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Terac | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 3% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Sovrano AI | 0% | 39% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 42% | 0% | 1.0 | 17% |
| RemoExperts | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 81% | 9% | 1.0 | 9% |
| Innodata | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Vetto | 15% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| OneForma | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| xAI (SpaceXAI) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 24% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Aligned Labs | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Surge AI | 0% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 8% | 0.0 | 8% |
| Scale AI Human Frontier Collective | 30% | 0% | 70% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 10% | 1.0 | 40% |
| iMerit | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| DATAmundi | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Pasiflora AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Elsevier Health | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 83% | 0% | 1.0 | 0% |
| Cohere | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 1.0 | 0% |
| Pila8 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| RealTrainAI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Mistral AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Remotasks | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Sama | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Fleet AISmall sample | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 1.5 | 50% |
| AnthropicSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Edison ScientificSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| EvolutionIQSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| HeadwaySmall sample | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 2.0 | 100% |
| Inworld AISmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| JazzX AISmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| KastleSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| LimbicSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1.0 | 0% |
| PointClickCareSmall sample | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 2.0 | 100% |
| Snorkel AI Expert CommunitySmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.0 | 0% |
| TrellisSmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1.0 | 0% |
| Vals AISmall sample | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1.0 | 0% |
Sample. 4,000 roles open on 31 Oct 2026 whose job board publishes a full description (AfterQuery, Aligned Labs, Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Babel Audio, Braintrust, Claru, Cohere, DataAnnotation, DATAmundi, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Fleet AI, Handshake AI, Headway, iMerit, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Lifted (Upwork), Limbic, Mercor, micro1, Mindrift, Mistral AI, OneForma, OpenTrain AI, Outlier (Scale AI), Pasiflora AI, Perle Labs, Pila8, PointClickCare, Prolific, RealTrainAI, RemoExperts, Remotasks, Rise Data Labs, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip), Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Sovrano AI, SuperAnnotate (SME), Surge AI, TELUS Digital AI, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Turing, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI)): 91.3% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read. Only these platforms publish descriptions, so only they are compared here.
Each step column is the share of the platform's described roles that state it.
Rows with fewer than 2.1 described roles are marked as a small sample and not ranked: below that the average of the rows weighs more than a row's own described roles (the weight fitted on the rows' own counts).
Many descriptions on one platform share a template, so a platform's share often reflects one standard paragraph about its process rather than role-by-role choices.
A step counts when the description states it, as a requirement or as something that may be asked ('a brief assessment may be added'). A platform can screen more than it writes down, so every share is a floor.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 5
Screening stated, by kind of work
Which kinds of AI training work are screened the hardest?
| Kind of work | Assessment | AI interview | Interview | Background check | ID check | Median steps | 2 or more steps | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Evaluation & Rating (RLHF) | 14% | 15% | 12% | 1% | 0% | 3% | 5% | 0.0 | 14% |
| Law, Medicine & Finance | 9% | 4% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 35% | 7% | 0.0 | 12% |
| Coding & Software Evaluation | 10% | 11% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 2% | 0.0 | 9% |
| Math & STEM | 9% | 4% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 4% | 9% | 0.0 | 9% |
| Multilingual & Localization | 12% | 7% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 0.0 | 8% |
| Research Studies & Surveys | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 13% | 0.0 | 6% |
| Red-Teaming & AI Safety | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 11% | 0.0 | 3% |
| Agentic Tasks & RL Environments | 5% | 6% | 3% | 10% | 1% | 15% | 2% | 0.0 | 3% |
| Data Annotation & Labeling | 6% | 3% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 21% | 3% | 0.0 | 2% |
| Transcription, Audio & Speech | 7% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 1% | 0.0 | 1% |
| Robotics & Physical-AI Data | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0% |
| Writing & Content | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0.0 | 0% |
Sample. 4,000 roles open on 31 Oct 2026 whose job board publishes a full description (AfterQuery, Aligned Labs, Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Babel Audio, Braintrust, Claru, Cohere, DataAnnotation, DATAmundi, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Fleet AI, Handshake AI, Headway, iMerit, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Lifted (Upwork), Limbic, Mercor, micro1, Mindrift, Mistral AI, OneForma, OpenTrain AI, Outlier (Scale AI), Pasiflora AI, Perle Labs, Pila8, PointClickCare, Prolific, RealTrainAI, RemoExperts, Remotasks, Rise Data Labs, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Shaip (Collaborate by Shaip), Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Sovrano AI, SuperAnnotate (SME), Surge AI, TELUS Digital AI, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Turing, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI)): 91.3% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read.
A kind's row pools the platforms that publish descriptions. 'From one platform' is the share of its roles listed by the platform with the most of them: near 100%, the row reads that platform's process.
Rows with fewer than 13.5 roles read are marked as a small sample and not ranked: below that the average of the rows weighs more than a row's own roles read (the weight fitted on the rows' own counts).
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 6
What application forms require
Which documents and answers must an applicant give before the form will submit?
| Item | Forms asking | Forms requiring it |
|---|---|---|
| Resume or CV | 97.7% | 85.7% |
| Phone number | 99.2% | 86.6% |
| Location or country | 88.6% | 82.0% |
| LinkedIn profile | 72.4% | 41.3% |
| Portfolio, website or GitHub | 27.8% | 0.2% |
| Work authorization or visa sponsorship | 14.3% | 14.3% |
| Availability, hours or start date | 7.7% | 7.4% |
| Expected pay or rate | 14.4% | 7.7% |
Sample. 1,682 application forms of roles open on 31 Oct 2026, read from the applicant-tracking systems of Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Cohere, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Handshake AI, Headway, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Limbic, Mindrift, Mistral AI, PointClickCare, Prolific, Remotasks, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI): 38.4% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read.
Required: the form will not submit without it. Name and email, asked by every form, are not listed.
Work authorization, availability and pay are read from the label of each question the platform adds (the applications report's question themes). The pay theme covers both questions asking an applicant's expected rate and questions asking them to accept the stated rate.
Invisible lists 31.7% of the forms, so the pooled shares lean on its process; the by-platform figure separates the platforms.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 7
Form burden: required fields per form
How much must an applicant fill in before a form will submit?
| Required fields | Forms | Share of forms |
|---|---|---|
| 4 or fewer | 221 | 13.1% |
| 5 to 9 | 479 | 28.5% |
| 10 to 14 | 682 | 40.5% |
| 15 to 19 | 229 | 13.6% |
| 20 or more | 71 | 4.2% |
Sample. 1,682 application forms of roles open on 31 Oct 2026, read from the applicant-tracking systems of Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Cohere, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Handshake AI, Headway, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Limbic, Mindrift, Mistral AI, PointClickCare, Prolific, Remotasks, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI): 38.4% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read; a median of 10 required fields of 10 in all.
Form burden: the fields a form will not submit without, from name and email to the last required screening question. Some platforms apply in steps (a short form, then an assessment); only the first form is read.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 8
Form burden, by platform
Which platforms ask the most of applicants on the form itself?
| Platform | Median required fields | Median fields | Resume required | Phone required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All forms read | 10.0 | 10.0 | 86% | 87% |
| Volga Partners | 24.0 | 31.0 | 100% | 85% |
| RWS TrainAI Community | 18.0 | 25.0 | 100% | 100% |
| PointClickCareSmall sample | 17.0 | 27.0 | 100% | 100% |
| xAI (SpaceXAI) | 17.0 | 21.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Innodata | 16.0 | 19.0 | 97% | 97% |
| TransPerfect DataForce | 16.0 | 18.0 | 92% | 100% |
| Handshake AISmall sample | 14.0 | 17.0 | 100% | 100% |
| AnthropicSmall sample | 13.0 | 20.0 | 100% | 0% |
| Vetto | 13.0 | 22.0 | 5% | 95% |
| Vals AISmall sample | 12.0 | 13.0 | 100% | 0% |
| HeadwaySmall sample | 11.0 | 14.0 | 0% | 100% |
| Remotasks | 11.0 | 12.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Sigma AI | 11.0 | 18.0 | 99% | 68% |
| Cohere | 10.5 | 13.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Invisible | 10.0 | 10.0 | 99% | 100% |
| Sama | 10.0 | 14.0 | 100% | 33% |
| Scale AI Human Frontier Collective | 10.0 | 12.5 | 70% | 100% |
| Edison ScientificSmall sample | 9.0 | 20.0 | 100% | 0% |
| Snorkel AI Expert CommunitySmall sample | 9.0 | 13.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Welo Data | 9.0 | 17.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Appen | 7.0 | 13.0 | 0% | 0% |
| LimbicSmall sample | 7.0 | 7.0 | 100% | 0% |
| Elsevier Health | 6.5 | 8.0 | 100% | 100% |
| Anyone AI | 6.0 | 12.0 | 100% | 93% |
| EvolutionIQSmall sample | 6.0 | 10.0 | 0% | 100% |
| Mindrift | 6.0 | 7.0 | 100% | 100% |
| TrellisSmall sample | 5.0 | 14.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Weekday | 5.0 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% |
| JazzX AISmall sample | 4.0 | 9.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Mistral AI | 4.0 | 11.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Prolific | 4.0 | 9.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Inworld AISmall sample | 3.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 0% |
| KastleSmall sample | 3.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 0% |
| Terac | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0% | 100% |
Sample. 1,682 application forms of roles open on 31 Oct 2026, read from the applicant-tracking systems of Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Cohere, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Handshake AI, Headway, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Limbic, Mindrift, Mistral AI, PointClickCare, Prolific, Remotasks, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI): 38.4% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read. Only these platforms' forms are read, so only they are compared here.
Work authorization, availability and pay: the share of forms with a required question of that theme.
A platform's medians are stated from 3 forms read (the fewest a middle is stated from); rows with fewer are marked as a small sample and not ranked. Forms of one platform usually share one template, so its medians describe that template.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 9
Screening questions on the form, by platform
What does each platform's form ask applicants about, beyond the resume?
| Platform | Work authorization or visa sponsorship | Availability, hours or start date | Expected pay or rate | Degree or field of study | Experience or years in a field | Languages spoken or fluency | Licence or certification | Prior AI training or annotation work | Age or being over 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All forms read | 14% | 8% | 14% | 21% | 19% | 32% | 0% | 12% | 2% |
| Anthropic | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Anyone AI | 0% | 0% | 82% | 0% | 81% | 94% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Appen | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Cohere | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
| Edison Scientific | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Elsevier Health | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| EvolutionIQ | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Handshake AI | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Headway | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Innodata | 100% | 0% | 90% | 100% | 0% | 81% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| Invisible | 0% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Inworld AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| JazzX AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kastle | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Limbic | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mindrift | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mistral AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| PointClickCare | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Prolific | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Remotasks | 67% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| RWS TrainAI Community | 0% | 43% | 12% | 69% | 15% | 96% | 0% | 65% | 0% |
| Sama | 0% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Scale AI Human Frontier Collective | 90% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 90% | 0% |
| Sigma AI | 1% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 28% | 67% | 0% | 4% | 0% |
| Snorkel AI Expert Community | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Terac | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| TransPerfect DataForce | 13% | 8% | 63% | 13% | 50% | 66% | 0% | 3% | 11% |
| Trellis | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Vals AI | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Vetto | 0% | 5% | 0% | 5% | 40% | 70% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Volga Partners | 27% | 46% | 86% | 100% | 83% | 56% | 0% | 56% | 7% |
| Weekday | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Welo Data | 17% | 13% | 2% | 21% | 48% | 27% | 0% | 16% | 1% |
| xAI (SpaceXAI) | 94% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 88% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Sample. 1,682 application forms of roles open on 31 Oct 2026, read from the applicant-tracking systems of Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Cohere, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Handshake AI, Headway, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Limbic, Mindrift, Mistral AI, PointClickCare, Prolific, Remotasks, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI): 38.4% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read; themes read from the label of each question the platform adds to its form.
Each cell is the share of the platform's forms asking at least one question of the theme. A question can match more than one theme.
Questions on how the applicant heard of the role and voluntary equal-opportunity questions are left out: they do not screen.
No row with any forms read is a small sample: the rows differ so much that each reads on its own from its first.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
Figure 10
Form burden, by kind of work
Do forms for some kinds of AI training work ask more of applicants?
| Kind of work | Median required fields | Median fields | Resume required | Phone required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Annotation & Labeling | 17.0 | 24.0 | 95% | 97% |
| Transcription, Audio & Speech | 10.0 | 13.0 | 86% | 84% |
| Multilingual & Localization | 10.0 | 10.0 | 87% | 82% |
| Red-Teaming & AI Safety | 10.0 | 17.0 | 60% | 100% |
| AI Evaluation & Rating (RLHF) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 73% | 77% |
| Math & STEM | 10.0 | 10.0 | 96% | 96% |
| Writing & Content | 7.5 | 10.0 | 83% | 100% |
| Agentic Tasks & RL Environments | 6.0 | 7.0 | 95% | 100% |
| Coding & Software Evaluation | 6.0 | 10.0 | 90% | 94% |
| Law, Medicine & Finance | 6.0 | 10.0 | 78% | 85% |
| Research Studies & Surveys | 6.0 | 7.5 | 50% | 100% |
| Robotics & Physical-AI Data | 6.0 | 7.0 | 98% | 95% |
Sample. 1,682 application forms of roles open on 31 Oct 2026, read from the applicant-tracking systems of Anthropic, Anyone AI, Appen, Cohere, Edison Scientific, Elsevier Health, EvolutionIQ, Handshake AI, Headway, Innodata, Invisible, Inworld AI, JazzX AI, Kastle, Limbic, Mindrift, Mistral AI, PointClickCare, Prolific, Remotasks, RWS TrainAI Community, Sama, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sigma AI, Snorkel AI Expert Community, Terac, TransPerfect DataForce, Trellis, Vals AI, Vetto, Volga Partners, Weekday, Welo Data and xAI (SpaceXAI): 38.4% of the 4,381 roles open on the 62 platforms read.
A kind's row pools the platforms whose forms are read. 'From one platform' is the share of its forms from the platform with the most of them: near 100%, the row reads that platform's form.
A kind's medians are stated from 3 forms read (the fewest a middle is stated from); rows with fewer are marked as a small sample.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition.
For labs, data vendors and researchers
Buy the data behind this report
The figures above are a summary. Behind them are records we collect ourselves, every day:
11,482 roles tracked, each with its history
Every role on 62 job boards, read since 13 Jul 2026 (every hour since 18 Oct 2026): its pay and place, and the first and last day it was open.
58,632 apply clicks in 28 days
Which roles people actually apply to, by field, pay and kind of work. It happens on this site, so nobody else can count it.
39 lab and vendor hiring boards
The job boards of 25 AI labs and 14 human-data vendors, read every day: who is hiring for human data, and who is hiring to buy it.
What you can buy
The records
The rows behind any figure, with their history, not only the totals.
A regular feed
The same figures every week or month, as files.
A custom cut or benchmark
Your countries, languages or fields, or your own platform against the market.
Building AI and need the experts behind this data? (you contract them yourself) or (we deliver the expert work).
Investing in AI-data companies? Hiring radar is these records role by role, every day, as files.
Method and definitions
The public job boards of the AI training platforms this site tracks, read every hour: the full description of each open role where the board publishes one, and the application form of each open role where the platform's applicant-tracking system (Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workable, Teamtailor and others) is read. Every figure is computed by one database query over the window shown, the same query for the live report and for every edition. Each figure states its sample beneath it.
- Screening step
- One of seven checks a description can state: an assessment, test or trial task; an AI-led or recorded interview; an interview with a person or of an unstated kind; a background check; identity verification (the five selection steps); a professional credential or licence; work samples, a portfolio or a publication record (the two kinds of proof of expertise). A step counts when the description states it, as a requirement or as something that may be asked.
- Selection passage
- The part of a description about applying and being selected: a section headed as the process ('Process', 'Application steps', 'What to expect'), a sentence about the application, onboarding, screening or selection (and the sentence after it), or a sentence about the applicants outside the sections that describe the work or the qualifications. The five selection steps are read only there, with the requirements report's patterns and a few documented additions, so 'conduct psychological assessments' or 'transcribe interviews' in the work is not counted as a check.
- Proof of expertise
- A professional credential or licence the description names (medical, legal, nursing, financial, board certification or any licence), or work the applicant must show: samples, a portfolio or reel, a verifiable GitHub profile, or a publication record. Read from the whole description, named as a requirement or a preference.
- Screening depth
- How many of the seven screening steps a description states. Shown as a median and as the share of roles stating two or more.
- Form burden
- The number of fields an application form will not submit without, from name and email to the last required screening question.
- Required
- The form will not submit without the field.
- Question theme
- What a question the platform adds to its form is about (work authorization, availability, pay, degree, experience, languages, a licence, prior AI training work, age), read from its label with the applications report's documented patterns. The pay theme covers both an applicant's expected rate and accepting the stated rate.
- Coverage
- A platform's board either publishes full descriptions or exposes its application form, and some do neither. Each figure states which platforms and what share of all open roles it reads, and a platform is only ever compared on the source it publishes.
- Open role
- A role listed by a given day and still in its platform's feed that day.
- Kind of work
- Each role is classified from its title and description into one of the twelve kinds of AI training work this site tracks, from AI evaluation and coding to multilingual and audio work. Every kind links to its own page.
- Window
- Live: the roles open at the end of the last 28 complete days, in UTC. Edition: the roles open at the end of one calendar month.
What this data cannot tell you
- Stated, not observed: a platform can screen more than its descriptions say, so every share is a floor. Pass rates are not published, so this report cannot say how selective any step is.
- Descriptions and forms come from different platforms, and some platforms publish neither: the coverage figure names them. The platforms that publish full descriptions are expert networks, so the description figures lean towards expert work.
- Most descriptions and forms on one platform follow one template, so a platform's figure often reflects one standard paragraph or one form, and pooled shares lean on the platform with the most open roles.
- Only the first application form is read; assessments and interviews that follow on a platform's own site are visible only when the description states them.
- A step phrased in an unusual way can be missed, and a step stated inside a section that describes the work, without a word about applying or selection, is not counted.
- Platforms that recruit without a public job board are not counted. Several large ones invite workers to projects directly.
- A listing is not a hire. Some platforms keep evergreen roles open for months, and some post one listing per language or country.
How the job feeds are read and roles are classified: site methodology. How fresh, complete and consistent the data is, checked every day: data quality and coverage.
Editions
The live report covers the last 28 complete days and changes every day. Each complete month is also published as an edition, frozen two days after the month ends, so a figure you cite from an edition never moves.
- Live dataLast 28 complete days, recomputed daily
- October 2026 edition (this page)Freezes on first reading
Cite and reuse
Free to quote, chart and republish under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page. This edition is frozen, so its figures will read the same later.
Citation
AITraining.jobs (2026). How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition. https://aitraining.jobs/research/how-ai-training-platforms-screen-experts/2026-10
BibTeX
@misc{aitrainingjobs_how_ai_training_platforms_screen_experts_2026_10,
author = {{AITraining.jobs}},
title = {How AI Training Platforms Screen Experts, October 2026 edition},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aitraining.jobs/research/how-ai-training-platforms-screen-experts/2026-10}},
}More research
- Applicant Demand for AI Training WorkWhere do people who want AI training work apply, and which roles are short of applicants?Read the report
- How AI Training Applications WorkWhat do AI training application forms ask, and how long are they?Read the report
- What Draws Applicants to AI Training RolesWhich traits of an AI training role draw more applicants, compared within the same kind of work?Read the report
- AI Training Work Without ExperienceHow much AI training work is open to people without a degree or professional experience, and what does it pay?Read the report
- Who Looks for AI Training WorkWho is looking for AI training work: in which fields, with what credentials, from which countries, and how many already work on an AI training platform?Read the report
- Do Applicants Qualify for AI Training Roles?When the people looking for AI training work are checked against the roles that suit them best, how often do they qualify, and what do they most often lack?Read the report
- AI Training Talent: Supply and DemandWhere are there more people looking for AI training work than roles to fill, and where are roles short of qualified people?Read the report
- The State of AI Training PayWhat does AI training work pay, by kind of work and by platform?Read the report