Head-to-head
micro1 vs Turing
Which pays more, which is easier to start, and which fits the work you want. Compared on real pay, work model, payout, and the roles open right now.
micro1
Turingmicro1 vs Turing: the short answer
, AITraining.jobs lists 425 open micro1 roles (typical pay $45 to $180 an hour, median $70) and 212 open Turing roles.
micro1 pays more on typical work ($45-$180/hr typical (live median $70) vs Turing's $15–$200/hr; raters $15–$30/hr), a 74% chance on the rates the two boards state.
micro1 is easier to get into: of the people we know applied, about 3.4% are accepted there against 1.8% at Turing (a 80% chance it really accepts more). Both are expert networks: gated by a screen for a degree, professional expertise, or a skills test.
Both hire for AI Evaluation, Domain Experts, Coding, Math & STEM, and Agentic & RL Envs; micro1 also covers Data Annotation, Robotics Data, and Multilingual; Turing also covers Red-Teaming.
Right now micro1 has more live roles (425 vs 212).
Bottom line: micro1 both pays more and is easier to start on here, so it is the default pick; choose Turing if its specific work (Coding, AI Evaluation, Math & STEM, Domain Experts, Red-Teaming, and Agentic & RL Envs) fits you better.
| micro1 | Turing | |
|---|---|---|
| Typical pay | $45-$180/hr typical (live median $70) | $15–$200/hr; raters $15–$30/hr |
| Work model | Expert network · AI-vetted expert marketplace | Expert network · Coding-centric data |
| Kinds of work | AI Evaluation, Data Annotation, Robotics Data, Domain Experts, Coding, Math & STEM, Agentic & RL Envs, and Multilingual | Coding, AI Evaluation, Math & STEM, Domain Experts, Red-Teaming, and Agentic & RL Envs |
| How you get paid | USD via Deel (bank, PayPal, Wise, Payoneer). | Monthly for the hours your manager approves: processed by the 5th business day of the following month into a USD wallet (Airwallex) on Turing's portal and withdrawn by bank transfer, or through Deel depending on the project (Project Onboarding, read 6 Nov 2026). |
| Where you can work | Worldwide, except the 21 places its page for experts says it cannot hire residents of (Ukraine, Ethiopia, Russia, Belarus, China, Hong Kong, Iran and Venezuela among them; read 8 Nov 2026). Heavy multilingual demand. | Fully remote in most countries, but not from the 30 its own onboarding marks as US sanctions (OFAC) countries, where it does not verify IDs: Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, China, Iran, Venezuela and Lebanon among them (read 22 Oct and again 6 Nov 2026, unchanged); its Create your Account article also says residents of mainland China cannot apply. Many contracts need ~4 hrs daily overlap with US Pacific time. |
| Open roles now | 425 live | 212 live |
| Worker ratings | Trustpilot 4.7/5 (11,177 reviews) · Glassdoor 4.5/5 (189 reviews) · Indeed 4.8/5 (262 reviews) (read November 2026) | Trustpilot 2.3/5 (205 reviews) · Glassdoor 3.5/5 (789 reviews) · Indeed 4.6/5 (92 reviews) (read November 2026) |
Pay shows each platform's live measured band where its feed has enough hourly-stated roles, otherwise our compiled benchmark. How we compile pay.
Best for professionals and specialists chasing the highest rates.
425 open roles now →Best for people with a degree or professional skills who want vetted, higher-skill work.
212 open roles now →Some links on AITraining.jobs are referral links. If you sign up through one, AITraining.jobs may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes what a platform pays you.
How their pay compares with the market
micro1. On 11 Nov 2026, 96.0% of its open roles stated an hourly rate. Their 408 distinct advertised rates have a median of $70/hr and typical pay of $45 to $180/hr, against a median of $35/hr across other platforms' rates.Compared within the same kinds of work (11 with enough rates on both sides), the advertised median at micro1 runs 25.1% above other platforms' and is higher in 9 of the 11; the widest gap is in Math & STEM ($90/hr against $40/hr). micro1 Hiring Data
Turing. On 11 Nov 2026, 17.5% of its open roles stated an hourly rate. Their 37 distinct advertised rates have a median of $100/hr and typical pay of $15 to $100/hr, against a median of $40/hr across other platforms' rates.Compared within the same kinds of work (3 with enough rates on both sides), the advertised median at Turing runs 9.6% below other platforms' and is higher in 1 of the 3; the widest gap is in Multilingual & Localization ($15/hr against $35/hr). Turing Hiring Data
Weekly roles email
Get new AI training jobs by email
The newest paid roles across every platform we track, with real hourly pay, in one weekly email. Free, and unsubscribe anytime.
We email new roles, not spam. One click to unsubscribe.
micro1 vs Turing: common questions
Which pays more, micro1 or Turing?
micro1 pays more on typical work ($45-$180/hr typical (live median $70) vs Turing's $15–$200/hr; raters $15–$30/hr), a 74% chance on the rates the two boards state.
Is micro1 or Turing easier to get started with?
micro1 is easier to get into: of the people we know applied, about 3.4% are accepted there against 1.8% at Turing (a 80% chance it really accepts more). Both are expert networks: gated by a screen for a degree, professional expertise, or a skills test.
Can you work on both micro1 and Turing?
Yes. They are independent platforms, and many contributors join several at once to keep a steady flow of work, especially since both hire for AI Evaluation, Domain Experts, Coding, Math & STEM, and Agentic & RL Envs. Signing up for one does not affect the other.
More comparisons
Ordered by what applying to their platforms is worth, lifted by a referral boost for a platform that pays us a referral fee; it never changes what a platform pays you.